The video you see below is Republican Congressman Peter King on New York, and he’s talking about the way the media has treated the Michael Jackson story. Now, I can agree with almost every word he says, but there just a few I can’t agree with. Look at the video and can you guess which ones I can’t agree with?
So, any guesses?
The words are “low-life”, “pervert”, “child molester”, “paedophile”.
Michael Jackson was NEVER convicted of child molestation or paedophilia. Now, if Peter King had used words such as “celebrity”, “singer” or “superstar”, then I could have agreed with him 100%. Being the TruthSeeker isn’t something I am for show, it is something that pervades every ounce of my being. Factual accuracy has to be at 100%, 100% of the time. It may well be that Peter King believes Jackson was guilty, like many others believe OJ Simpson was guilty of murder, but like OJ, he wasn’t convicted, so he should have tempered his opinions with words like “I think”, “I believe”, “in my opinion”, you get the picture. But no, Peter King used those words as though they were fact, recorded history, truth, undeniable. So, Peter King gets +50% on the TruthSeekerMeter, which rates a “partially true”
No comments:
Post a Comment